409 results
King v Svetlana Svedova
[2023] NICC 6 O'Hara J
Parker (Anthony) and Caldwell's (James) Application
[2023] NIKB 24 Humphreys J
Worton's (Colin) Application (Leave Stage) and In the matter of a decision by the Justice Minister
[2023] NIKB 27 Rooney J
King v Kevin Blake
[2023] NICA 93 Fowler J
Summary of Judgment - In re Denise Mullan
Summary of Judgment - In re Denise Mullan
Mullan (Denise) Application for Judicial Review and in the matter of decisions of The Department of Justice and Denise Mullan and Department of Justice and John McNeice and Garfield Beattie
[2023] NIKB 19 Colton J
Chadwick (Justin) and Harvison's (Andrew) Application and in the matter of decisions of The Northern Ireland Policing Board
[2023] NIKB 7 Scoffield J
Historic Royal Palaces and Piperhill Construction LTD
[2023] NIKB 30 McBride J
Avelina Ximines Belo's Application and in the matter of a decision by The Secretary of State for The Home Department
[2023] NIKB 20 Rooney J
Joel De Deus's Application (leave Stage) and in the matter of a decision by the Secretary of State for the Home Department
[2023] NIKB 26 Rooney J
Eamon Flanagan (Appellant) and The Commissioner of Valuation for Northern Ireland (Respondent)
NIVT 11/20 Mr Farrelly
SS (Appellant) and The Department of Finance (Respondent)
NIVT 6/22 Mr Farrelly
Gavin McKenna and Ministry of Defence
[2023] NIKB 17 McAlinden J
JR249's Application (Leave Stage)
[2023] NIKB 25 Colton J
McAleenon's (Noeleen) Application
[2023] NICA 15 Horner LJ
In the matter of an inquest into the deaths of Dougal, Butler, Fitzpatrick, McCafferty and Gargan (‘The Springhill Inquest’) - Ruling (Number 1) On the Ministry of Defence request for documentation to be sought by the Coroner
[2023] NICoroner 24 Scoffield J
Brent Larmour and Joan Larmour
[2023] NICh 4 McBride J
Summary of Judgment - R v Gerard McKenna
Summary of Judgment - R v Gerard McKenna
King v Qing Wen Lin, Long Quang Lin Lin Zheng, Zhu Lin & Yang Wu Chen
Renewed application for leave to appeal sentence – money laundering operation – Proceeds of Crime Act 2022 – whether sentences manifestly excessive – applications to receive new material granted – principle of mercy applied to two mothers - Article 8 ECHR – the offender’s personal circumstances - judge erred in confining exceptional circumstances to the offending itself - disparity in sentencing – deterrent sentences – culpability – the aggravating factors contained highly prejudicial assertions not agreed or proven – prosecution portrayal of the roles and knowledge attributed to the appellants was inconsistent - roles/rankings which the judge attributed to certain appellants were neither agreed nor proven - leave granted – appeals allowed - sentences reduced.
Guidance in relation to the following sentencing principles can be found at paragraphs [86] – [110] - mercy in sentencing, Article 8 ECHR to include reference to R v Petherick [2013] 1 WLR 1102, exceptional circumstances, the offender’s personal circumstances, disparity in sentencing, deterrent sentences and culpability.