Sentencing guidelines - Sexual Offences

37 results

16 January 2026

King v Gordon McBrearty

The NICOA provided general guidance in respect of the offence of sexual assault (intentional sexual touching committed by an adult against an adult), contrary to Article 7 of the Sexual Offences (NI) Order 2008, at paras [26] and [27].

Appeal against a 45 month custodial sentence (split equally between custody and licence) – whether the sentencing judge erred in adopting a starting point of five years imprisonment for a non-penetrative assault – NICOA held the sentencing judge had erred by straying beyond the agreed facts and sentenced for the more serious offences which had been left on the books – NICOA held a sentence in the range of three years was appropriate prior to 25% reduction for the guilty plea – appeal allowed – sentence of 27 months imprisonment (split equally between custody and licence) substituted.

[2026] NICA 4 Keegan LCJ

09 January 2026

King v Sebastian Kasak

The NICOA revisited and clarified its earlier judgment in R v Watson [2022] NICA 71, providing guidance to sentencing judges in respect of sexual offending against children at para [13], particularly in respect of when non-custodial options may be appropriate.

Appeal against a 12 month custodial sentence (split equally between custody and licence) – attempted sexual communication with a child under 16 years old – whether the sentencing judge erred in concluding that a community based sentence could not be considered and in choosing a starting point of 18 months – NICOA held sentencing judge erred in failing to consider a community based disposal at all – one-off offence by a relatively young man with a clear record – remorse and victim empathy – rehabilitation potential – strong employment and family support – appeal allowed – two-year probation order substituted.

[2026] NICA 2 Keegan LCJ

18 December 2024

The King v Alexander McCartney

This is a short addendum ruling correcting an error in sentencing within the main judgment reported at [2024] NICC 30 . Determinate custodial sentences were replaced with extended custodial sentences where necessary

[2024] NICC 36 O'Hara J

25 October 2024

King v Alexander McCartney

Crown Court sentencing remarks – catfishing – sextortion - manslaughter - causing or inciting girls under 13 and between the age of 13 and 16 to engage in sexual activity – blackmail – making, distributing and possessing indecent images of children – causing a person to engage in sexual activity without consent - intimidation - sexual communication with a child - offending against 70 victims worldwide – harm inevitably and indisputably huge – assessed as presenting a significant risk of serious harm – victim did not prove on the balance of probabilities that he was the victim of catfishing as a child – no previous record – pleas of guilty – some limited evidence of remorse post 2019 – numerous aggravating factors outlined at para [77] - extensive and worsening offending after his first arrest in 2016 – life sentence imposed – 20 year minimum tariff imposed with concurrent sentences in respect of the remaining counts – 10 year SOPO – disqualified from working with children – disposal order in respect of 13 devices

[2024] NICC 30 O'Hara J

21 June 2024

The King v Michael Beattie

In this judgment the Court of Appeal provides guidance on the imposition of Sexual Offences Prevention Orders (SOPOs) at paragraphs [18] and [37].

Appeal against imposition of a SOPO – sexual activity with a child between the age of 13 and 16 - causing or inciting a child between the age of 13 and 16 to engage in sexual activity - SOPO made for five years and prohibited any contact with children under 16 of either gender or the victim who is now over 18 - whether SOPO wrong in principle and terms disproportionate - breadth of order as originally framed infringed the appellant’s family life disproportionately to risk he can be found to pose to children - substituted SOPO of same duration of five years with conditions considered necessary and proportionate – principles at paragraph [18] to be applied by judges considering imposition of SOPO in this jurisdiction - SOPO’s must be tailored to circumstances of each case and cannot be presented in formulaic way to avoid disproportionate orders being made - practitioners and judges must be cognisant of the high threshold required when considering the imposition of a SOPO - appeal allowed.

[2024] NICA 51 Keegan LCJ

22 March 2024

The King v Jonathan Playfair

The Court of Appeal provides assistance in relation to online blackmail and sextortion (see in particular paragraphs [66] and [111]-[114])

Renewed application for leave to appeal an extended custodial sentence of six years imprisonment and four years extended licence – various sexual offences - indecent images - disclosure of private sexual photographs and films with intent to cause distress - online blackmail – sextortion - whether the starting point of nine years and the four year extension period were manifestly excessive – whether the SOPO was necessary and contrary to principle – right form of sentence attached to the wrong offences – overall sentence affirmed – leave to appeal granted – sentence restructured - appeal allowed to the extent of setting aside the invalid orders and substituting the sentences outlined in paragraph [116].

The Crown Court judgment can be located at [2023] NICC 15

[2024] NICA 21 Treacy LJ

08 March 2024

The King v Jonathan Hutton

At paragraph [58] of this judgment the Court of Appeal, while decrying an unduly mechanistic approach, provides guidance to assist sentencing judges when dealing with multiple offence, multiple victim cases.

Application to appeal a sentence of 12 years imprisonment – variety of sexual offences – two young female victims – totality – transparency - a sentence in the region of 11-12 years held to be appropriate - appeal dismissed

[2024] NICA 19 Keegan LCJ

09 February 2024

The King v CD

The Court of Appeal clarifies the law and the approach to be taken with regards to sentencing in cases involving the sexual assault of children, particularly with reference to the application of R v GM [2020] NICA 49. (See in particular paragraphs [44] – [47])

DPP reference in respect of a sentence of two years imprisonment – two counts of sexual assault of a child under 13 – whether sentence unduly lenient – court not satisfied that the sentence met the very high threshold of being unduly lenient – leave granted given the issues that arose with regards to the application of R v GM – reference dismissed

[2024] NICA 9 Keegan LCJ

09 February 2024

The King v Ritchie

Crown Court sentencing remarks which provide assistance in sentencing for the offence of the abuse of a position of trust contrary to Article 23 of the Sexual Offences (Northern Ireland) Order 2008 (See in particular paragraphs [18] – [20])

Five specimen counts of abuse of a position of trust – support worker at a children’s home – looked after child with history of addiction and mental health issues – DCS three years and six months (18 months custody and 2 years statutory supervision)

[2024] NICC 5 His Honour Judge Rafferty KC

12 January 2024

The King v Jacek Pacyno

The Court of Appeal sets out guidance in relation to offences conducted over the internet which involve engaging in sexual activity in the presence of a child or causing or inciting children to engage in sexual activity. The fact that there is no direct physical contact does not alter the seriousness of such offending and the need for condign punishment.

DPP Reference to review a three year probation order – pleas of guilty in respect of a range of sexual offences against children online – whether sentence unduly lenient – delay – Reference allowed – probation order quashed and substituted with 18 months imprisonment.

[2024] NICA 3 Keegan LCJ

05 December 2022

The King v ZB

Guidance provided on sentencing for two equally serious offences on a concurrent basis applying the totality principle - GBH with intent – sexual assault by penetration of a 12 day old baby – sentence of 19 years imprisonment plus an extended period five years - whether manifestly excessive – starting point – dangerousness - culpability and harm high – whether premeditation – no mitigation save for guilty pleas – sentence not manifestly excessive – exceptional circumstances – appellant provided no explanation or offered remorse – appeal dismissed.

[2022] NICA 69 Keegan LCJ

07 October 2022

King v Shaun Hegarty

guidance in relation to sentencing for rape with aggravating features - appeal against sentence - whether sentence of 20 years plus five years extended term manifestly excessive - rape whilst unconscious – did not disclose previous convictions - grievous bodily harm - attempting to choke - previous rape - no remorse - blamed victim for her injuries – starting point – transparency – methodology of sentence – sentence beyond usual range and may be unprecedented in this jurisdiction – high culpability and high harm with myriad of aggravating factors – appropriate custodial term is one 18 years – no error in 5 year extension period - appeal dismissed.

[2022] NICA 55 Keegan LCJ

15 January 2021

Queen v Gerald O'Hara

Appeal against sentencing at re-trial – whether sentence manifestly excessive - Sexual Offences Prevention Order - indecent assault on children – sentences affirmed – SOPO discharged

[2021] NICA 1 McCloskey LJ

12 March 2020

R v Byrne & Cash

Sexual Assaults contrary to Art 6 Sexual Offences (NI) Order 2008 – whether ECOs a suitable disposal.

[2020] NICA 16 Morgan LCJ

04 September 2019

THE QUEEN v KT

Whether failure to activate two previous suspended sentences and to impose a third suspended sentence unduly lenient – sexual offences - 85 year old man - numerous sexual offences involving children – sentence quashed and the two previous suspended sentences activated and pass a sentence so as to achieve an effective total determinate custodial sentence of 3 years

[2019]NICA 42 Keegan J , Stephens LJ , Treacy LJ

31 May 2019

DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTION'S REFERENCE (Number 1 of 2018) VINCENT LEWIS

Whether sentence unduly lenient - multiple offences of indecent assault, buggery and attempted buggery committed on three children - offender an elderly man of 91 years - monk at Portglenone Abbey – sentences unduly lenient – sentences amended.

Neutral Citation No: [2019] NICA 26 McBride J , Morgan LCJ , Stephens LJ

16 May 2019

R v QD Director of Public Prosecution's Reference (Number 6 of 2019)

Reference by DPP NI under S. 36 Criminal Justice Act 1988 as amended by S. 41(5) Justice (NI) Act 2002 – whether sentence of 5 months’ custody unduly lenient - sexual assault of a child under 13 contrary to Article 14 of the Sexual Offences (NI) Order 2008 – whether failure to impose a SOPO unduly lenient – sentence quashed and SOPO imposed.

[2019] NICA 23 Stephens LJ

20 December 2018

R v CZ

Sexual offence prevention orders - applications made to Crown Court in respect of variations, renewals and discharge, and appeals thereafter to the Court of Appeal - demarcation between appeals in respect of SOPOs imposed as part of sentence and appeals in respect of variations, renewals and discharges - need for SOPO's to be carefully formulated

[2018] NICA 53 Maguire J

27 January 2017

R v James William Taggart

Appeal against sentence – rape contrary to Article 5(1) of the Sexual Offences (NI) Order 2008 – common assault contrary to s. 47 OAPA 1861 – whether sentence for rape (ECS – 9 years in custody plus 2 on licence) manifestly excessive and/or wrong in principle – whether judge justified in concluding that there was significant risk of serious harm etcetera – Kubik applied – contesting the prosecution not an aggravating factor – Gilbert distinguished on the facts – appeal allowed – ECS of 7 plus 2 substituted.

[2017] NICA 5 Weir LJ

12 April 2016

R v Alan McDonald

Appeal against sentence - historic sexual abuse - discretionary life sentence - whether necessary to make finding of unstable character - whether offences sufficiently grave - whether likely future offending must be sex offences - whether alternative protective sentence could be imposed - appeal dismissed.

[2016] NICA 21 Weatherup LJ