8023 results
Piperhill Construction Limited and Northern Ireland Housing Executive
[2025] NIKB 47 Humphreys J
JR187 (2)'s Application
[2025] NIKB 48 McLaughlin J
Haberlin (Liam) Application for Judicial Review (leave stage)
[2025] NIKB 45 Humphreys J
King v Marc Doak
[2025] NICC 16 O'Hara J
Imelda McLaughlin and Italian Coffee Holdings Limited T/A Cafe Nero and Others
[2025] NIMaster 11 Master Harvey
In the matter of an inquest touching upon the death of William Victor McLean
[2025] NICoroner 6 Mrs Fee
Summary of judgment - R v Hazel Stewart
Summary of judgment - R v Hazel Stewart
King v Hazel Stewart
[2025] NICA 36 Keegan LCJ
Charity Commission for Northern Ireland
4/24 Mr McMahon
McGrath (Darragh) Application for Judicial Review
[2025] NIKB 44 Scoffield J
King v Alan Trevor Campbell
[2025] NICC 18 His Honour Judge Miller KC
Arthur Douglas Charlwood (Appellant) and Antrim & Newtownabbey Borough Council (Respondent)
NIVT 17/24 Mr Leonard
In the matter of an application by John Hamilton Hassard, Robin Bruce, Carol Porter, Robert McKean, David Peoples, Wildridge Coote, Derick Donnell, David Brush and Victor Brush as members of the alternative A5 Alliance
[2025] NIKB 42 McAlinden J
Summary of judgment - R v CD
Summary of judgment - R v CD
King v CD
[2025] NICA 34 Treacy LJ
King v Michael Costar
[2025] NICA 37 Keegan LCJ
King v Clive Weir
The NICOA [1] stressed the importance of plain and simple language in sentencing decisions at paras [34] and [35], [2] reiterated the principles governing ‘Newton’ hearings at paras [17] – [23] and [3] outlined the importance of monetary figures put forward by the prosecution having a solid and evidential foundation capable of discharging the prosecution onus of proving the relevant amount beyond reasonable doubt at paras [32] and [33].
Appeal against a three year DCS (split equally between custody and licence) – cultivation of cannabis – converting criminal property – using criminal property for the purchase of fuel – NICOA held the sentencing judge failed to adopt any of three optional courses available with regards to the disputed financial benefit (set out at para [23]) or to provide a reasoned ruling or explanation on this issue – the “Newton error” did not result in a manifestly excessive sentence – sentence reaffirmed – appeal dismissed
King v Emmanuel Quinn
[2025] NICA 40 McLaughlin J