7531 results
Jason Moore's Application and In the matter of a decision of the Parole Commissioners for Northern Ireland
[2024] NIKB 61 Scoffield J
The King v Viktoria Maksymowicz
[2024] NICC 18 O'Hara J
Malachy Goodman's Application and In the matter of a decision by Parole Commissioners for Northern Ireland dated 28 February 2024
[2024] NIKB 58 McAlinden J
The King v Amy Allen
[2024] NICC 17 His Honour Judge Miller KC
In the matter of P (A Patient) - MB and The Northern Health and Social Care Trust and Gold Health Care and The Official Solicitor to the Court of Judicature in Northern Ireland
[2024] NIFam 10 Rooney J
Summary of judgment - R v Kenneth Clarke and Jamie McConnell
Summary of judgment - R v Kenneth Clarke and Jamie McConnell
The King v Jordan Glasgow
[2024] NICA 54 McCloskey LJ
Fibrus Networks Ltd and Gareth Leckey and R&B Consulting and Brokerage Services Ltd
[2024] NIKB 57 McBride J
SGM 15's Application and In the matter of the findings and verdict of Coroner McGurgan on 6 September 2022 arising from the inquest into the death of Master Stephen Geddis
[2024] NIKB 56 Colton J
The King v Kenneth Clarke and Jamie McConnell
DPP reference – whether sentences unduly lenient - conspiracy to steal, commit arson and to commit criminal damage – theft of machinery to damage property with the forced removal of ATMs from commercial properties - case mistakenly presented to the judge on basis the headline offence was conspiracy to commit theft attracting a max sentence of ten years - judge in error as to lower starting point – substituted a sentence of seven years and six months in case of Clarke – reference allowed - reference in case of McConnell dismissed – sentences in this area must be deterrent – prosecutors should consider charging for separate offences where possible - guidance provided in cases involving multiple incidents at para [41]
4[2024] NICA 52 Keegan LCJ
King v Gabriel Paul Meehan
[2024] NICC 38 O'Hara J
Conrad McQuaid and Briege McQuaid and Patrick Mallon as Executors of the estate of Terence Benedict McQuaid deceased (No. 2)
[2024] NICh 9 Humphreys J
Grade One Furniture Ltd v James Donnelly & Sons
BT/100/2023 Mr Spence
Richard Lynch and Regen Waste Ltd
[2024] NIKB 55 Colton J
Michael Quinn and The Department for the Economy
[2024] NICh 8 McBride J
Barry Cahill, Darren Williams and Patrick Dillon's Applications and In the matter of decisions of The Department of Health
[2024] NIKB 59 Scoffield J
AB and Logan Wellbeing Belfast Ltd, Logan Medical Belfast Ltd and Ruth Ellen Logan
[2024] NIMaster 14 Master Bell
The King v Michael Beattie
In this judgment the Court of Appeal provides guidance on the imposition of Sexual Offences Prevention Orders (SOPOs) at paragraphs [18] and [37].
Appeal against imposition of a SOPO – sexual activity with a child between the age of 13 and 16 - causing or inciting a child between the age of 13 and 16 to engage in sexual activity - SOPO made for five years and prohibited any contact with children under 16 of either gender or the victim who is now over 18 - whether SOPO wrong in principle and terms disproportionate - breadth of order as originally framed infringed the appellant’s family life disproportionately to risk he can be found to pose to children - substituted SOPO of same duration of five years with conditions considered necessary and proportionate – principles at paragraph [18] to be applied by judges considering imposition of SOPO in this jurisdiction - SOPO’s must be tailored to circumstances of each case and cannot be presented in formulaic way to avoid disproportionate orders being made - practitioners and judges must be cognisant of the high threshold required when considering the imposition of a SOPO - appeal allowed.